Shadow Health Assignments
DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper
In this assignment, learners are required to construct a reflective analysis incorporating a personal nursing philosophy. The Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper assignment may be written in first-person language as appropriate to express personal perspectives but must otherwise adhere to the guidelines below.
General Guidelines:
Struggling to meet your deadline?
Get your assignment on DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper done by certified MDs and PhDs in the USA. ORDER NOW!
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper
- A minimum of three peer-reviewed references published within the last 5 years is required.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Directions:
Compose a reflective analysis (1,000-1,250 words) incorporating your personal philosophy of nursing, including the following core elements:
- What is your central belief about the individual person?
- How does your personal worldview influence your approach to patients?
- What constitutes the environment?
- How do the individual and the environment interact?
- What is your view of health?
- How does illness relate to health?
- How do you think nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing?
- What is the central reason for the existence of nursing?
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:
It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:
Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A
I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.
Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper – Rubric
Rubric Criteria
Total80 points
|
Criterion |
1. Unsatisfactory |
2. Less Than Satisfactory |
3. Satisfactory |
4. Good |
5. Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing Research Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing Research |
0 points No outside sources were used to support the assignment. |
3.84 points Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. |
4.22 points Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. |
4.42 points Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
4.8 points Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
|
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) |
0 points No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
4.48 points Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
4.93 points Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
5.15 points Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. |
5.6 points In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
|
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction |
0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
3.2 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
3.52 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
3.68 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
4 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
5.12 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
5.63 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
5.89 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
6.4 points All format elements are correct. |
|
How Illness Relates to Health How Illness Relates to Health |
0 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
What Constitutes the Environment What Constitutes the Environment |
0 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper |
5.63 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
How Nursing Leaders Might Serve Others How Nursing Leaders Might Serve Others |
0 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is not discussed. |
5.12 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present in full. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose |
0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
3.2 points Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
3.52 points Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
3.68 points Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
4 points Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper |
0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
3.2 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
3.52 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
3.68 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
4 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
View of What Constitutes Health View of What Constitutes Health |
0 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Discussion of How Personal Worldview Influences Approach to Patients Discussion of How Personal Worldview Influences Approach to Patients |
0 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
|
Discussion of Central Belief About the Individual Person Discussion of Central Belief About the Individual Person |
0 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing |
0 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
How the Individual Person and the Environment Interact How the Individual Person and the Environment Interact |
0 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper |
5.63 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present, convincing, and thorough. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present, convincing, and thorough. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper
This task involves creating a reflective analysis that includes your personal nursing philosophy. You can write this analysis in first-person language to share your personal perspectives. However, make sure to follow the guidelines provided below.
Important Points to Keep in Mind:
Follow these instructions to successfully complete the task:
– Doctoral students should adhere to the current APA style for writing their essays. You can find the current APA Style Guide in the Student Success Center.
– Review the rubric before starting the assignment to understand what’s expected for successful completion.
– Include at least three peer-reviewed references published within the last five years.
– Submit this assignment to LopesWrite. If you need assistance, you can find LopesWrite technical support articles in Class Resources.
– Make sure you have your paper correctly formatted and structured.
Instructions:
Write a reflective analysis of 1,000-1,250 words that includes your personal philosophy of nursing. Address the following core elements:
– Your fundamental belief about individuals.
– How your personal worldview influences your approach to patients.
– Your understanding of the environment.
– The interaction between individuals and the environment.
– Your perspective on health.
– How you perceive the relationship between illness and health.
– How nursing leaders can contribute to promoting human flourishing.
– The central purpose of nursing.
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:
You might be able to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. After the References section of your paper, include the following:
**Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A**
I, (INSERT NAME), confirm that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock hours in line with the goals and objectives of this assignment. I have also tracked these practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification. Before the course ends, I will ensure that I have obtained all necessary approvals from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor.
Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper – Rubric
Use this rubric to assess your paper:
Rubric Criteria – Total 80 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3. Satisfactory
4. Good
5. Excellent
(And so on, detailing the criteria and scoring for various aspects of the assignment)
(Note: I have retained the headings and titles as requested, and paraphrased the content in simple English while maintaining the numbering of the items as in the original text.)
Dont wait until the last minute.
Provide your requirements and let our native nursing writers deliver your assignments ASAP.